<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contributing to Wordpress: Worth The Time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technocrank.com/2009/03/13/contributing-to-wordpress-worth-the-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technocrank.com/2009/03/13/contributing-to-wordpress-worth-the-time/</link>
	<description>It Done Broke.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crankietech</title>
		<link>http://technocrank.com/2009/03/13/contributing-to-wordpress-worth-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>crankietech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technocrank.com/?p=286#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links, drmike.

I don&#039;t quite understand the dogma behind Jane&#039;s &quot;platformist&quot; approach.  I do understand that as a community project it should be selfish to the community it serves.  On the other hand, if it&#039;s a community project then submissions for the icon designs for 2.7 could have been taken globally and then let the community decide which of those were the best regardless, even if some of them were from outside the community.

Really, when you think about it the communities (as a general social construct) tend to be selfish and implicitly exist to serve their own needs.  But since when did communities &lt;i&gt;ever&lt;/i&gt; dogmatically refrain from exploiting external resources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links, drmike.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t quite understand the dogma behind Jane&#8217;s &#8220;platformist&#8221; approach.  I do understand that as a community project it should be selfish to the community it serves.  On the other hand, if it&#8217;s a community project then submissions for the icon designs for 2.7 could have been taken globally and then let the community decide which of those were the best regardless, even if some of them were from outside the community.</p>
<p>Really, when you think about it the communities (as a general social construct) tend to be selfish and implicitly exist to serve their own needs.  But since when did communities <i>ever</i> dogmatically refrain from exploiting external resources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drmike</title>
		<link>http://technocrank.com/2009/03/13/contributing-to-wordpress-worth-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>drmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technocrank.com/?p=286#comment-12</guid>
		<description>The image on your Kind of a Captcha program is missing.  At least I was not able to obtain one.

It&#039;s nice to see someone else realizing that what Matt says and what he actually does are two separate things.  I hope you are familiar with &lt;a href=&quot;http://wankpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress Wank&lt;/a&gt;, a source that has called him out on a number of things.  I learned awhile back that Jane follows the &lt;a href=&quot;http://drmikessteakdinner.com/2008/10/30/yes-jane-you-are-a-platformist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;same pattern&lt;/a&gt;.

If you&#039;re really interested in contributing towards Wordpress, may I suggest working on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://trac.mu.wordpress.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress Multiuser trac&lt;/a&gt;?  Donncha, the lead developer there has a much different attitude towards those helping out and we regularly contribute patches that get accepted. (Although he does have to approve them before they get added in.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image on your Kind of a Captcha program is missing.  At least I was not able to obtain one.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see someone else realizing that what Matt says and what he actually does are two separate things.  I hope you are familiar with <a href="http://wankpress.com" rel="nofollow">Wordpress Wank</a>, a source that has called him out on a number of things.  I learned awhile back that Jane follows the <a href="http://drmikessteakdinner.com/2008/10/30/yes-jane-you-are-a-platformist/" rel="nofollow">same pattern</a>.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re really interested in contributing towards Wordpress, may I suggest working on the <a href="http://trac.mu.wordpress.org" rel="nofollow">Wordpress Multiuser trac</a>?  Donncha, the lead developer there has a much different attitude towards those helping out and we regularly contribute patches that get accepted. (Although he does have to approve them before they get added in.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crankietech</title>
		<link>http://technocrank.com/2009/03/13/contributing-to-wordpress-worth-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>crankietech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technocrank.com/?p=286#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Well, I think in certain cases it&#039;s good, reasonable and useful to be selfish.  However, if they&#039;re going to set up a system then ask for volunteers by putting out calls &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/development/2009/03/contributing-to-wordpress-part-i-development/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;like this one&lt;/a&gt;, then they really need to follow the protocols of that system and give contributors a fighting chance.  That is, if it is, in fact, a &lt;i&gt;genuine&lt;/i&gt; call for volunteers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think in certain cases it&#8217;s good, reasonable and useful to be selfish.  However, if they&#8217;re going to set up a system then ask for volunteers by putting out calls <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/2009/03/contributing-to-wordpress-part-i-development/" rel="nofollow">like this one</a>, then they really need to follow the protocols of that system and give contributors a fighting chance.  That is, if it is, in fact, a <i>genuine</i> call for volunteers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://technocrank.com/2009/03/13/contributing-to-wordpress-worth-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technocrank.com/?p=286#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I totally agree in your point. The feeling gets trough to the language teams too. Further more, the communication between the developers and users is more than poor. They sure do a great job, but it seems they are a bit selfish from time to time and doesn&#039;t pay enough attention to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree in your point. The feeling gets trough to the language teams too. Further more, the communication between the developers and users is more than poor. They sure do a great job, but it seems they are a bit selfish from time to time and doesn&#8217;t pay enough attention to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
